Usually, studios provide theaters with roughly 90 days of exclusivity before releasing films through other means. With Universal Pictures now defying that norm, this could potentially lead to long term issues for theaters. Will moviegoers want to give up the convenience of their own home? After all, home theater set-ups have improved substantially and it seems harder and harder to find a venue with patrons not on their phones or talking to one another.

After a few months of social distancing, new habits will form. Once loyal theatergoers may begin to shun going out for the latest films and embrace a simpler and more personal experience. Home set-ups may never truly match the screen and sound quality of a decent theater, but how good is good enough? Is the pure spectacle of it all still a strong draw? Or are Universal’s actions another nail in the traditional theater system’s coffin?

The post Universal Pictures to Release Films on VOD Amid Coronavirus appeared first on MovieRiffing.

Click here to listen to an audio version of this review.

The CGI takes your breath away…until you notice the mouths and facial expressions. In a quest to achieve realism, none of the animals emote with their faces. So a beautiful nature documentary plays out on screen, but the animals do not come across as real characters. None of them have any defining traits. They all look like real lions or birds and kudos to the animators but, that does not make for a good film. In a quest to see if they could, they forgot to ask if they should.

When shots noticeably zoom out and obscure characters’ mouths during long dialogue sequences, you know there is an issue. And in 2019, slow motion zoom outs should not be shot at two frames per second. Frame rate stuttering that noticeable is embarrassing. The disconnect between the “lively” voice-over work and stoic animal models leaves the whole ordeal feeling soulless; not to mention Mufasa’s rag-doll-esque death sequence.

Compounding the issue, the voice-over work suffers from a number of horrible performances. The banter between cub Simba and Nala was surprisingly stilted and difficult to endure. However, Pumbaa and Timone easily steal the show. Seth Rogen and Billy Eichner give wonderful performances as the duo, and brighten any scene they appear in. John Oliver, once you get past his recognizable delivery style, plays a serviceable to good Zazu. The remaining voice actors produced nothing of value. Lines were delivered flat and uninspired. Iconic dialogue lifted straight from the original movie did not carry the same emotional weight this time around. Nothing sounded as though two people were actually talking to one another. The hyenas in particular sounded disjointed and off. It would not be surprising to hear Beyonce recorded all of her lines over the phone.

Speaking of Beyonce, the music. For renowned musical numbers, boy were these versions dull and uninspired. Once elaborate, energetic, and colorful sequences found themselves reduced to long walks through the woods. Again, in order to maintain a “realistic” art style, director Jon Favreau sacrificed what made the original so beloved in the first place. Additionally, the covered songs do not surpass the 1994 classic’s. Listening to Beyonce oversing with unnecessary pitch changes just does not cut it.

The Lion King (2019) presents nothing new. While not intrinsically terrible, by failing to improve on or change anything from the 1994 original it fails to make a case for its existence. Cutting dialogue entirely and relying solely on the songs to convey the story would have been a more original and enjoyable approach (although much less marketable). At some point directors will realize chasing realism to the detriment of the film is an artistically bankrupt endeavor. Until then, they will gladly continue accepting the unholy sums of money this film will assuredly make.

The post The Lion King (2019) – Review appeared first on MovieRiffing.